Forum

Under Hood Insulati...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Under Hood Insulation?

16 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
222 Views
(@holden)
Posts: 478
Honorable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

What are folks using for under-hood insulation these days that is similar to original?


 
Posted : 13/01/2017 6:41 am
(@Rob Hesselmann)
Posts: 0
 

Russ,

I can't answer your question, but am very curious if it did much to quiet the engine noise?

Rob


 
Posted : 13/01/2017 12:44 pm
(@kholmes)
Posts: 419
Reputable Member Registered
 

I don't recall there was any, originally.


 
Posted : 13/01/2017 1:28 pm
(@aminard)
Posts: 155
Estimable Member Registered
 

Beginning with the 1952 Hornets and Commodore 8's, the factory installed a fiberglass pad about 70% of the size of the hood surface. We were told it was to help reduce engine noise.


 
Posted : 13/01/2017 4:17 pm
(@gjevne)
Posts: 586
Honorable Member Registered
 

Never saw that on any stepdown Hudson. There was insulation of the 55-57 Hudson hoods though.


 
Posted : 13/01/2017 11:00 pm
(@aminard)
Posts: 155
Estimable Member Registered
 

Even my '53 Super Jet had a fiberglass insulation pad on the underside of the hood. It was standard on Super Jets and Jetliner in 1954


 
Posted : 14/01/2017 1:40 am
(@dlm31)
Posts: 960
Noble Member Registered
 

Ditto what Jerry said. We will start stocking this at WRP soon. It can also be used for other cars, even though it was not original until '52. It does really work. If you look closely, you can see where it was originally on most, just gone after the ages or probably part of what was the mice's Hotel in the glove box!

[quote="Jerry Bean" post=18935]Beginning with the 1952 Hornets and Commodore 8's, the factory installed a fiberglass pad about 70% of the size of the hood surface. We were told it was to help reduce engine noise.


 
Posted : 14/01/2017 2:36 am
(@jstreich49)
Posts: 227
Estimable Member Registered
 

Our Hudsons, 52 Hornet,53 Hornet 53 and 54 Jets all had the blonde fiberglass insulation from new. This was in the later 50's.
Running the Hornet with no air filter led to disaster as fiberglass inside the engine acted like valve grinding compound . Expensive
lesson learned!

'Ric"


 
Posted : 14/01/2017 4:17 am
(@m-patterson56)
Posts: 452
Reputable Member Registered
 

Not to mention an unnecessary/unwanted cylinder honing job.
F


 
Posted : 14/01/2017 7:06 am
(@holden)
Posts: 478
Honorable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Jerry probably remembers, bur we had this discussion about 10 years ago and the consensus was the same, started sometime in '52. I've seen plenty of cars that have originals.
Walt always cautioned against it as it tends to hold heat in. With today's gas, that's an important point to consider.
However, after the fire, the inside of the hood is not attractive as it once was (even though it was repainted) and I was considering putting the insulation in to hide a few sins.
I've decided to sell Scarlett and there's a few small things like that that need attention.
Doug, let me know when they become available.


 
Posted : 14/01/2017 1:58 pm
(@dennyscars)
Posts: 276
Reputable Member Registered
 

Rob, when I put the insulation on my 49, it did quiet it down a bit (but that car wasn't anywhere as noisy under the hood as a Hornet) I believe the pad keeps the hood form reverberating and transmitting the noise that way, It also, keeps the hood cool, which is nice, As the hood isn't vibrating and transmitting noise, the sounds coming through the firewall become a bit more prevalent. Overall, I am glad I put it on

Lew


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 2:09 am
(@dennyscars)
Posts: 276
Reputable Member Registered
 

Russ, When I did my 52 C-8 convert, I wanted to put the correct pad under the hood. Fortunately, I had a good example in both my 54 and a piece that was in the pile of parts that came with the 52. So, I set out to find a replacement. I contacted a few, local, commercial insulation suppliers and found the correct material. It is about an inch thick, a light yellow color and only available from them in huge, expensive rolls. So, armed with the knowledge that the material was still available I searched the internet and found there were several other cars that used the same stuff. I contacted a few and found one that would sell me uncut to do 2 Hudson hoods. Unfortunately, I can't find the identity of the guy bought it from

Take a look at http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1958-CHEVROLET-IMPALA-YELLOW-UNDER-HOOD-INSULATION-PAD-GRAY-1PC-/222001581658
It is a underwood mat made using the same material.

After I put it in the 52, I found a few disadvantages in the material. It separates fairly easy with the wind from the fan as well as picks up dirt real easy. It is OK in the 52 but I wouldn't put it in a driver. In my 49, I used a similar gray/black material and it is a lot more durable. It is something like http://www.ebay.com/itm/DMT-Universal-Under-Hood-Insulation-Pad-48-x-48-x-1-2-T-Cut-to-fit-FREE-SHIP-/290953500651
One more thing, A friend of mine has an original 49 Commodore. It too has the pad. So at first I figured it wasn't available on the lower priced cars. But I parted out a Super Wasp that also had the pad. I've also seen original Hornet cars without the pad. So, for the life of me I can't figure out the rule for availability, I wonder if anyone has any documentation.... just curious


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 2:36 am
(@dennyscars)
Posts: 276
Reputable Member Registered
 

Hmm, it didn't post the links.... Let's try again

ebay.co.uk/itm/1958-CHEVROLET-IMPALA-YELLOW-UNDER-HOOD-INSULATION-PAD-GRAY-1PC-/222001581658

ebay.com/itm/DMT-Universal-Under-Hood-Insulation-Pad-48-x-48-x-1-2-T-Cut-to-fit-FREE-SHIP-/290953500651

After 3 tries, the ;inks worked when I removed the HTTP and the www Oh well!!


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:04 am
(@holden)
Posts: 478
Honorable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Thanks for the links and the info, Lew.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 6:04 am
(@Rob Hesselmann)
Posts: 0
 

Thank you Lewis for the information!

Rob


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 2:18 am
Page 1 / 2

Leave a reply

Author Name

Author Email

Title *

Maximum allowed file size is 10MB

 
Preview 0 Revisions Saved
Share: